hat the NCAA not only is liable under Title IX because of dues but also because it has received a major federal grand in the past thirty years. Attorneys for the NCAA maintain it does not receive federal funding and, as such, ôargued such discrimination cases should be filed against individual schools,ö (Supreme, 1999, p. 2).
The NCAA finds itself being in the lofty position of advocating anti-discrimination laws and policies while seeming to hold itself immune from responsibility to do so. In another landmark case alleging discrimination against the NCAA under Title VI, Cureton v. NCAA, 198 F.3d 107 (3d Cir. 1999). In this case, Tai Kwan Cureton and Leatrice Shaw sued the NCAA, claiming that the use of SAT and ACT scores to determine athletic eligibility discriminates on the basis of race because minorities generally score lower on the standardized tests th
...